A subsistence economy is a type of economic system in which individuals or communities produce only what they need to survive. These economies are often found in rural areas or developing countries where resources are limited and basic necessities are not readily available. Here are some additional evidences to support this notion.
 |
| Subsistence Economy |
Characteristics of a Subsistence Economy
Subsistence economies are typically characterized by a lack of access to modern technologies and infrastructure, which limits the production of goods and services. Most people who live in subsistence economies are farmers, fishers, or hunters who rely on natural resources for their livelihood. For instance, in parts of Africa and Asia, subsistence agriculture is still practiced as a way of life. People cultivate small plots of land to grow crops to feed themselves and their families.
Subsistence economies are often organized around communal systems, with land and resources owned and managed collectively. In India, for example, there are several tribes that live in the forests and practice subsistence economy. They rely on community ownership and cooperation for their survival.
 |
| India tribesman, Chenchu, is shown drawing his bow. Hunting used to be an important activity for the men |
Advantages of a Subsistence Economy
Despite the limitations and challenges of subsistence economies, they offer several advantages over market economies. For one, they are generally more sustainable, as they rely on local resources and do not deplete or damage the environment. They also tend to be more resilient in the face of natural disasters or economic downturns, as people are used to living with limited resources and are able to adapt to changing circumstances. A study conducted in Ethiopia found that subsistence farming was more resilient to drought than commercial farming.
Subsistence economies also tend to be more egalitarian, as wealth and resources are distributed more evenly among members of the community. This can help to reduce social tensions and promote a sense of shared responsibility and mutual support. A research conducted in Peru found that communal ownership of land and resources resulted in lower levels of poverty and inequality.
 |
| Peru terrace farming - Wiki |
Disadvantages of a Subsistence Economy
However, subsistence economies also have several disadvantages. One of the main drawbacks is the lack of access to modern technologies and infrastructure, which can limit economic growth and development. Without access to education or training, people may lack the skills and knowledge needed to improve their livelihoods or increase productivity.
Subsistence economies also tend to be vulnerable to external pressures and influences, such as climate change or globalization. For example, changes in weather patterns or natural disasters can have a significant impact on crop yields or fishing stocks, while changes in market demand or trade policies can disrupt traditional trading patterns and practices. A research conducted in Tanzania found that subsistence farmers were highly vulnerable to climate change impacts, such as crop failure and water scarcity.
Finally, subsistence economies can be socially and politically unstable, as tensions can arise over resources, power, and decision-making. Without a strong institutional framework or legal system, conflicts may escalate and lead to violence or social unrest. For instance, the conflict between herders and farmers in Nigeria is largely driven by competition over resources in a subsistence economy.
Comparison to a Market Economy
A market economy, on the other hand, is characterized by private ownership and competition, with individuals and businesses seeking to maximize profits and minimize costs. This type of economy relies on modern technologies and infrastructure, and is often associated with high levels of economic growth and development. In a market economy, people produce goods and services for sale or trade, rather than for their own subsistence.
 |
| Image credit: Investopedia / Mira Norian |
While a market economy offers many advantages, such as greater efficiency and innovation, it also has several drawbacks, such as income inequality, environmental degradation, and social fragmentation. In contrast, a subsistence economy emphasizes communal ownership and cooperation, and values sustainability and social cohesion over individual profit.
Conclusion
In conclusion, subsistence economies are unique economic systems that have their own set of advantages and disadvantages. While they may seem very different, subsistence and market economies are not mutually exclusive. Many communities around the world rely on a mix of subsistence and market activities to meet their needs. For example, farmers in rural areas may grow crops for their own consumption as well as for sale in local markets. Fishers may catch fish for their families and also sell the surplus to nearby towns or cities.
It is important to recognize that subsistence economies are not necessarily primitive or outdated, but rather reflect a way of life that has evolved over generations in response to local conditions and cultures. Similarly, market economies are not inherently superior, but rather reflect a particular set of values and priorities.
Ultimately, the choice between a subsistence and a market economy depends on a range of factors, including resource availability, cultural values, and institutional frameworks. While market economies may offer greater opportunities for economic growth and development, they also come with significant social and environmental costs. On the other hand, subsistence economies may be more sustainable and egalitarian, but they can also be vulnerable to external pressures and limited in their ability to meet complex or diverse needs.
By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of different economic systems, we can work towards creating more equitable and sustainable societies that meet the needs of all their members. This requires a willingness to question assumptions and challenge conventional wisdom, and to recognize that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to the complex challenges facing our world today.